During the Soviet period when atheistic policies prevailed,
local Islam has undergone quite significant changes. In mass perception “Islam”
was preserved as a cultural phenomenon and a way of life that expressed itself
in traditional rites and especially in the cult of “sacred space”
and “saints”. Ziyarat was sort of a hideout where Islam
remained vivid and active all over the Soviet period and until this day, and
ziyarat is what many people have come to understand as the actual
core of their personal Islam.
The Soviet scholars used to consider the cult of sacred places and saints
as a so-called “remainder of the outdated past”, but these “remainders”
did not only exist and persist, but enjoyed wide acceptance. When the end
of the Soviet Union brought about freedom of belief and religion, the years
of national independence not only observed an increase in activity around
the ziyarat phenomenon, but the State has even come to actively support
and strengthen the ziyarat cult.
The mazars of Karakalpakstan today – which
are assemblies of graves including or not including distinguised ziyarat
locations of famous local saints – (change this if it is not correct)
present themselves as actual “little towns” with a particular
architecture of their own. Over the last period of time these mazars and their
specific mazar architecture as we might call it, have constantly grown in
physical extension and in social importance. Many of them today enjoy broad
popularity and attract a whole lot of pilgrims. New forms of cult come into
being. Around the mazars and specific ziyarats legends are collected
or even new ones are being created.
Over the last period of time these mazars have constantly grown in physical
extension and in social importance. Many of them today enjoy broad popularity
and attract a whole lot of pilgrims. New forms of cult come into being. Around
the mazars and specific ziyarats legends are collected or even new
ones are being created.
Thus we may say that the cult of saints and sacred places does not only still
exist, but it is flourishing, developing and growing in importance. On top
of everything, by the end of the 20th century a social institution has undergone
an interesting development and has gained more and more importance with national
independence: The so-called sheykhchi, who is the guardian of the mazar.
Over time and in dependence of historical circumstances,
the status of the sheykhchi (guardian) has changed, and so has the relation
between the guardian and the mazar itself.
In pre-Soviet times only very distinguished sacred places had a shaykh, that
is, a specific person who looked after the place and was entitled to collect
alms from the visitors. Today almost every mazar and other place of pilgrimage
has its own sheykhchi. In pre-Soviet times a mazar would belong to a given
sheykh (or ishan, that is, member of a spiritual descent line) and this attribution
would be handed down within the so-called sacred families. From the Soviet
period on, guarding a mazar has been transformed into a profession of its
own kind. This is clearly shown in the very term that is now being used: (Karakalpak)
sheyikhshi < sheykh+shi, with the suffix chi that denotes persons who professionally
occupy themselves with the given item”. Interestingly enough, cases
have been reported of madrasa students who found employment as sheykhshi of
a given sacred place, or even as “deputy sheykhshi”. More recently
there have been right-out sheyikhshi elections, the electorate being local
communities or the mosque community.
Patron:
President of Austria, Dr. Heinz Fischer
KCTOS: Knowledge, Creativity and
Transformations of Societies